khelswanbe
New Member
Thank you very much Kakching Thinks for accepting my request to join this unique forum.
Posts: 14
|
Death
Nov 9, 2014 19:45:27 GMT 5.5
via mobile
Post by khelswanbe on Nov 9, 2014 19:45:27 GMT 5.5
What happens when we die? Say what belief you have in this regard.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 9, 2014 20:51:05 GMT 5.5
What happens when we die? My mind's compass turns a 360-degree revolution several times reading this. Are you speaking clinically in which the stoppage of the heart-beat, breathing and so on are taken into account? Is a cultural anthropologist or a chemist in you speaking?☺ Say what belief you have in this regard. The word "belief," I believe, gives the clue to the probability of your speaking in spiritual terms. Then, that's what I am most interested in life. But for confirmation, isn't it the theme of your thread, oja Khelsoril?
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 9, 2014 21:57:59 GMT 5.5
Is there an almighty Lai? (I prefer this Manipuri term to the sexist English terms, God and Goddess.) What does mahak (angain, a gender neutral Manipuri term for the third person singular personal pronoun) have to do with the universe and the lives of individual creatures, their deaths, and their posthumous spiritual affairs, if anything transcends death? If there is an almighty Lai, is mahak necessarily good? Why so? If mahak is good, then is there necessarily a devil, an evil force? Why this dialectics? Which force is the champion? If there is no champion, if these two forces are in an eternal struggle for dominance, why should we mortals identify ourselves with a particular force and not with the other? By the way, aren't the concepts of good and bad/evil culturally informed? If Lai is not the champion, how could mahak be the "almighty"? If there is an almighty Lai, mahak must certainly be the champion, good or bad (no mattet what we term that quality). No opposition standing in front of mahak. If Jesus says this to his mortal disciples Ye have heard that it hath been said, thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? Do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? Do not even the publicans so? Matthew 5:43-5:47 then, the almighty Lai (if any) must be certainly more loving than humans, which Jesus's next sentence reinforces Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. Matthew 5:48 And if a father is so happy to have his prodigal son back home For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry. Luke 15:24
It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found. Luke 15:32 then, the almighty Lai (if any) must be happy to have the spirits/souls of mahakki wanderlust children. This is how I look at death, informed by parts of the Bible, which I think is not along the lines of traditional canonical interpretation. This is not the end.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 9:10:31 GMT 5.5
It seems improbable that there is an agent managing the universe, controlling even your natural calls and involuntary actions such as sneezing and breething and their modalities. It's not because God cannot do digestion for you, move food in your digestive tract and push the waste out of your excretory organs in the form of urine, sweat, and ☺; it is because such an idea of a busy personal God does not seem possible.
Then, is the world an orderless chaos? No. The world cannot be an orderless chaos. From the smallest to the largest of things (say, from atoms to the universe) known to us, there is the evidence of an interrelated order or a system. The periodic table shows the systematic distribution of matter in nature. The solar system follows the same law of nature as what we see in an atom. Evidently, there is an order, a system, or a design.
If there is soul, though it is not of matter, it must behave based on the same principle as that which forms a system, which may be independent or part of a larger system. In either case, it is unlikely that the spiritual system would be in contradiction to the system of matter, whether or not they are independent and unrelated systems or they constitute a larger system.
My contention here is that it seems nobody arbitrarily decides whether one goes to heaven or hell when one dies. It is the uncompromising and uncompromisable system that determines everything. If the world is a system, and if there is nothing beyond this system, then the question comes: What are good and evil, and where do these ideas come from? The binary ideas of heaven and hell seem to be culturally informed.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 9:46:05 GMT 5.5
If the soul is immaterial and if it is conscious, it must be pure consciousness without a shape. A consciousness without a body. The soul of the departed, thus, cannot have a form, and thus, they cannot look like how their bodies looked while in flesh and blood, though we want to think of and remember our dears departed in the beloved form familiar to us.
(To be continued)
|
|
khelswanbe
New Member
Thank you very much Kakching Thinks for accepting my request to join this unique forum.
Posts: 14
|
Death
Nov 10, 2014 14:16:07 GMT 5.5
Post by khelswanbe on Nov 10, 2014 14:16:07 GMT 5.5
Thank you very much, Oja Thoithoi, for sharing your valuable thoughts on the subject of "Death." Yes, "belief" has to do with something which cannot be readily supported with concrete/ substantial/ physical evidences. It has to do with something which has been given as fact or truth, but whose acceptance or rejection depends on the choice of the person who encounters it. One example: A person may or may not belief in the existence of God or evil. Religious books talk about the existence of God/ gods/ devil and demons. Different religions believe in different God/gods. So, agnostics and atheists choose or prefer to be free from all these controversies. Some religions believe in harsh God/gods, some believe in many gods--there are thousands and millions of beliefs, belief systems etc. Even in the same religion, say, Christian, there are hundreds of denominations whose belief systems/doctrines widely differ. For instance, the Catholics believe in the divinity of Mary whereas many millions of Protestant Christians believe that Mary was only a human being, who was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, who is believed to be God who incarnated as a human being. And in many other subjects and issues, there are numerous conflicts and controversies within Christianity itself. Likewise, I believe there are countless differences, conflicts and disagreements in other religious bodies too say, Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, etc. Coming to the subject that is being discussed i.e., "Death"; here too, I believe there are numerous beliefs on what happens at death; whether there is something called soul/spirit; whether the death can see, hear, feel sorrow, anger and so on. If I am to express my personal view or belief, I can only say "I don't know." But if you ask me if I want to know what happens at death, my answer will be "Of course". But the difficulty is where to find the answer to my queries about something which is beyond my five senses-- beyond what is physical-- something metaphysical-- something I cannot know while I'm still alive. Consequently, I start out in quest of answers to my spiritual queries-- I come across many answers, but which one shall I choose out of the many. It is up to me to choose or decide which one I should believe-- which one is most convincing as far as I am concerned. I do believe in free thinking, free choice and free decision. But I do have my own belief! Which I shall not try to impose upon anybody. This is not the end yet, of course.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 17:20:13 GMT 5.5
Every quest starts where pre-existing knowledge terminates in the sense that we draw blank when ransaking our knowledge bank for information or what we know fails to satisfy our quriosity. While scintific quests starting out into the emptiness of the unknown may discover solid, material foothold if they find answers. However, philosophical quests, starting in darkness, ever remain groundless. If a ground is ever found, that, being immaterial, remains questionable at best. But, this being the nature of philosophy is not a negative quality, because philosophy cannot be but this.
At the same time, philosophy is not a matter of faith or belief. Faith or belief has more to do with religion while philosophy, though can be, or even is sometimes, related with religion, has its own ontology. Philosophy first desiccates what it takes from religion so no religious sap remains in it.
I speak from this very dry, rational position, meaning that I just don't take it to be true just because such and such scriptures say so, or so and so philosophers have said so. Philosophers are/were people like you and me, and they were not selected like Noah, Abraham, Jeremiah, and the like. I believe scriptures, whatever religion they may be of, were written by people, yes of some quality, but still people.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 17:52:13 GMT 5.5
Thus, let us step into this darkness, but in doing this we will not engage in wild, chaotic play of guessing. We will remain guided by our rationality. Yes, when stretched almost to its limit, our rationality may become frayed or verge upon irrationality, but we will let it go as far as we don't lose our integrity. In one of my posts above, I said: If there is soul, though it is not of matter, it must behave based on the same principle as that which forms a system, which may be independent or part of a larger system. In either case, it is unlikely that the spiritual system would be in contradiction to the system of matter, whether or not they are independent and unrelated systems or they constitute a larger system. The gist of this is that I think there is no contradiction between the material system of reality and the spiritual system of reality though they have different measures of their own. Difference does not presuppose contradiction. There is no contradiction between sweetness and bitterness. They are just different. Spirituality cannot be irrational though our readon may not be the right or good enough tool to trace all its movement quite in a way detectives with all their logic and devices developed using mathematical and scientific principles fail to trace the trails of several crimes whiles these crimes may have in no way committed in an illogical way. There are a lot of things happening following certain orders ( we call the order logic) which we fail to trace. However, just because we cannot follow the order we cannot call that process illogical or irrational. It is simply that we don't know what specific order that process follows. In the same way, spiritual things follow some order, some logic, or some rationality, and our material rationality may not be fully able to follow that process for the trace to form a coherent story. However, it is unlikely that the spiritual realm follows a logical process of its own which is incoherent for and incompatible with the logical process of material reality. It is probably something like the system of the spiritual world is of a too high and/or too low frequency/frequencies (don't think of it in material terms:)) ) for the material world while they describe the same path. The point being made is while we don't know for sure what happens to our soul (if it transcends bodily death) after our death, our logical investigation and rationally guided speculation will really help us.
|
|
khelswanbe
New Member
Thank you very much Kakching Thinks for accepting my request to join this unique forum.
Posts: 14
|
Death
Nov 10, 2014 20:32:03 GMT 5.5
Post by khelswanbe on Nov 10, 2014 20:32:03 GMT 5.5
Yes, I agree that we should not simply believe whatever the scriptures say, we should try to verify the mighty claims and statements that are made in them with the help of facts, evidence, logic, rational thinking that are at our disposal.
Our belief should be based, as far as possible, on concrete evidences although it is true that doubts will continue to linger despite our hardest efforts.
|
|
khelswanbe
New Member
Thank you very much Kakching Thinks for accepting my request to join this unique forum.
Posts: 14
|
Death
Nov 10, 2014 20:39:01 GMT 5.5
Post by khelswanbe on Nov 10, 2014 20:39:01 GMT 5.5
What happens when we die? Say what belief you have in this regard.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 20:53:39 GMT 5.5
Yes, we will talk about this. I think a discussion on soul and the world of spirits/souls should start only after we have set the ground of reality, that is, after we have established the idea of reality. Without first establishing the reality of soul and the spiritual world, we cannot make a meaningful discussion on souls. The reality of souls and hence the spiritual world--the ontology of the soul--covers the modality of souls and the spiritual world.
What I have been doing is to establish this foundation of reality, or realities. We will surely find ourselves to have reached the core of the topic quite soon.
|
|
|
Post by Thoithoi O'Cottage on Nov 10, 2014 23:59:21 GMT 5.5
The world is of two realms--spriritual and material. The world of life we know occurs where the two worlds interact. Matter is dead and lifeless without a soul permeating it. A soul remains unmanifest to our senses without it being life to a material configuration, be it a plant or a creature. Life is the positive sign of the soul while death is its negative sign.
I think death is decomposition, the reverse of compisition. In decomposition, what got together to constitute an entity disintegrate. The soul and the body disengage from their union, and what constitute the body also disintegrate, the thus each and every element that went into the make-up of the body fall individually apart from one another, and everything goes back to the simplest state.
As energy (matter is energy, for e = mc2) can neither be created nor be destroyed, matter the universe's total energy remains constant. Matter changes its forms and states; it moves or flows from one point to another, one point losing energy but the other point gaining what the other has lost. But, its energy value remains the same in the whole system. In the same way, if the soul is, then it cannot cease to be. The body dies, decomposes and changes its state, but that does not affect the soul. The soul just continues to be. It cannot cease to be.
Now, the modality of the soul.
|
|